Students can post comments to questions, receive updates about the class, find homework development, and find help here. Parents can also keep up with what their student is doing in class.
i thought that the story about romney gaining 67 percent strength in the presidental election is mistakingly wrong. it is not a good thing that hes winning but its not a good thing if hes losing i think someone else should be president not any of them
I read the 1st two articles, Romney goes on offense, forcing Obama to defend record, and Obama-Romney Debate: Mitt Romney Stays Light On Detail. The 1st one spoke about how Romney was basically putting down Obama and forced him to defend himself and didn't give him a chance to even fight for himself or go on the offensive side. it stayed well on topic and kept going back to how Romney spoke of getting rid of Obamas products but never went into detail how. the 2nd article said that as well, but had a quote from Obama. this is what he said, "At some point, you have to ask, is he keeping all these plans to replace [programs] secret because they're too good? Families are going benefit too much from them?" Both articles stayed well on the subject but stayed mostly on what Romney was saying along with how much he didn't let Obama take the offensive, how Romney was calm and cool while Obama looked like he was about to lose his composure and how Obama hardly made eye contact with Romney during the debate. One reporter said it was easy to see how much Romney annoyed him.
The news article, The Tale of Two Men: Bias in Coverage of Clinton and Obama’s Speeches I thought and looked like it was written in paragraph form as well as split in various sections, all sides exposed then big contrasts between left leaning and right leaning. Also the writer wrote about Obama’s aspects and speech then turned around and commented on Clinton’s speech. In a different article I read, Healthcare Study: Bias Pick of the Week included the different papers reviews like New York Times. Included the left side and right side of the review also was included in each paper as well. From these different articles I noticed many different aspects that were used in great ways.
i thought that the story about romney gaining 67 percent strength in the presidental election is mistakingly wrong. it is not a good thing that hes winning but its not a good thing if hes losing i think someone else should be president not any of them
ReplyDeleteI read the 1st two articles, Romney goes on offense, forcing Obama to defend record, and Obama-Romney Debate: Mitt Romney Stays Light On Detail. The 1st one spoke about how Romney was basically putting down Obama and forced him to defend himself and didn't give him a chance to even fight for himself or go on the offensive side. it stayed well on topic and kept going back to how Romney spoke of getting rid of Obamas products but never went into detail how. the 2nd article said that as well, but had a quote from Obama. this is what he said, "At some point, you have to ask, is he keeping all these plans to replace [programs] secret because they're too good? Families are going benefit too much from them?" Both articles stayed well on the subject but stayed mostly on what Romney was saying along with how much he didn't let Obama take the offensive, how Romney was calm and cool while Obama looked like he was about to lose his composure and how Obama hardly made eye contact with Romney during the debate. One reporter said it was easy to see how much Romney annoyed him.
ReplyDeleteThe news article, The Tale of Two Men: Bias in Coverage of Clinton and Obama’s Speeches I thought and looked like it was written in paragraph form as well as split in various sections, all sides exposed then big contrasts between left leaning and right leaning. Also the writer wrote about Obama’s aspects and speech then turned around and commented on Clinton’s speech. In a different article I read, Healthcare Study: Bias Pick of the Week included the different papers reviews like New York Times. Included the left side and right side of the review also was included in each paper as well. From these different articles I noticed many different aspects that were used in great ways.
ReplyDelete